Writing a research paper can be rather challenging and very time-consuming, especially for those young Paper On Boot Camp people who lack the necessary skills and time. That’s why they all need professional writing help/10() Oct 19, · Research a boot camp, detention center or ranch/camp in Texas. October 5, / 0 Comments / in Home>Assignment Solution / by Write a word paper in APA style which explores the following questions: Research a boot camp, detention center or ranch/camp Boot camp is an alternative to incarceration. In this paper I will prove that Boot Camps for youthful offenders are effective. Boot camps started in the year by Warden Zebulon Brockway at the Elmira Reformatory located in Elmira, New York. The warden did this because he wanted to invoke a new way of disciplining and keeping the inmates active
Juvenile Rehabilitation in Boot Camps - Words | Research Paper Example
This sample History of Boot Camps Research Paper is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need help writing your assignment, please use our research paper writing service and buy a paper on any topic at affordable price. Also check our tips on how to write a research paperboot camp research paper the lists of criminal justice research paper topicsand browse research paper examples.
Correctional boot camps are programs modeled after military basic training. Just like basic training, boot camps emphasize drill and ceremony, and physical activity. Generally, boot camps target young, nonviolent offenders with limited criminal history. Boot camps are almost always short-term programs lasting 90— days.
Inmates who successfully complete these programs are released boot camp research paper supervision back to the community; however, inmates who drop out or are dismissed from the boot camps often are required to serve longer terms of incarceration in traditional correctional facilities. Correctional boot camps in the United States emerged, boot camp research paper, proliferated, and receded with remarkable speed.
In the early s, boot camps emerged in two states. Soon thereafter, boot camps boot camp research paper a national phenomenon with at least one boot camp operating in boot camp research paper majority of states by the mids. Near their peak popularity, the boot camp bubble burst and their popularity plummeted in the new millennium. Thus, in a span of a little more than 25 years, boot camps went from programs in a few states to being widespread back to obscurity.
All the while, boot camps remained controversial. This research paper traces the history of the rise, fall, and controversies of boot camps in the United States. Conversely, their demise was driven by a combination of research inconsistent boot camp research paper the goals of boot camp research paper camp and prominent cases boot camp research paper abuse.
In all of this, there is a larger cautionary tale that warns against latching on to the latest criminal justice fad without some reasonably rigorous empirical support for that intervention. While program names may vary, the military style that is at the core of each makes them a boot camp. The environment of boot camps resembles military basic training. Inmates typically live in barrack-style housing, are dressed in military uniforms, and are supervised by correctional officers with military titles e.
The daily routine at a boot camp is filled with planned activities and idle time is rare, boot camp research paper. Cadets are required to wake early, typically 5 am, boot camp research paper. They dress quickly and then march to an exercise area. After an hour or two of physical therapy and drills, boot camp cadets march to a dining area for breakfast, boot camp research paper.
Breakfast and all meals are orderly ceremonies. Cadets stand with their meals in hand until commanded to sit. Meals are eaten quickly and with minimal conversation.
Generally, when breakfast is complete, cadets either attend school or leave the camp to engage in community service such as road cleanup. Afterwards, cadets are required to complete more physical therapy and military drills. Cadets progress through three or more stages. Program activities vary by stage and there is usually decreasing emphasis on physical therapy and increasing emphasis on performing manual labor, work in the community e.
The total length of stay in a boot camp is 90— days but can boot camp research paper extended by misbehavior that causes an inmate to repeat a stage.
At all times, boot camps require inmates to adhere to a strict code of conduct. Deviations from these rules are met with verbal reprimands, punishments involving physical exercises e.
Serious cases of misbehavior can result in an inmate being required to repeat a stage, and continued serious misbehavior can lead to expulsion from the program. Those expelled are usually placed boot camp research paper other correctional facilities and required to serve longer periods of incarceration. Conversely, those who complete boot camp programming are honored at a formal graduation ceremony which family members are encouraged to attend. Those eligible for boot camp programs are almost always young and most often nonviolent offenders.
Because of the physically demanding nature of boot camps, inmates are required to be youthful; thus, boot camp inmates are juveniles or young adults typically, less than 30 years old, and very rarely more than 35 years old. Further, those eligible for boot camp participation are required to complete health screenings to ensure that they are capable of engaging in taxing physical activities.
Outside of this military atmosphere, boot camps vary widely. Some programs have little to no time allotted for treatment activities, while others devote considerable portions of the day to these activities.
Another important variation is in the manner and intensity of post-release community supervision; some programs offer offenders limited community supervision, while other boot camp programs offer intensive supervision. It is also important to note that boot camp programs appeared to evolve over time towards a rehabilitative focus. Early boot camps heavily emphasized military training.
Later boot camps still kept the military model as a core component; however, these later programs included high levels of rehabilitative programming, especially drug treatment Gransky et al. Above and beyond these programmatic differences, at its core, the boot camp model is premised on the notion that an austere correctional environment combined with military style training will reduce crime through two mechanisms. Second, boot camps instill discipline in program participants, which presumably is lacking, and this self-discipline allows participants to resist criminal temptations in the future.
Modern correctional boot camps emerged in the early s. Boot camps, however, have clear predecessors. This militaristic approach was adopted in an effort to instill discipline and to keep inmates active — the same boot camp research paper as modern boot camps.
The latter goal was particularly important at the time, as recent legislation restricted the use of inmate labor for commercial purposes, which had been the norm.
This military atmosphere remained in place at Elmira until Anderson et al. Military training was most systematically and thoroughly implemented in the modern boot camps that emerged in the early s. Oklahoma opened the first correctional boot camp in Later in the same year, Georgia opened a boot camp at the Dodge Correctional Institution.
Thereafter, boot camps spread rapidly across the United States. Byjust 10 years after their emergence, boot camp research paper, 59 camps were in operation in 29 states. Inthis number expanded to 75 state-operated boot camps for adults and 30 more for juveniles were in operation, as well as another 18 adult boot camps operating in county jails.
Boot camps even spread to the federal correctional system, where three correctional boot camps were in operation. These numbers surely underestimate the actual number of boot camps in boot camp research paper, as many boot camps, boot camp research paper, especially those for juveniles, were privately run.
Thus, at one point before the turn of the new millennium, the majority of states, the federal system, and some counties had at least one boot camp in operation, boot camp research paper. This explosive growth in boot camp programs was driven by many factors but three factors appear most important. The first of these factors is the dramatic growth of correctional populations, boot camp research paper.
Correctional populations increased rapidly in the s and s, which caused overcrowding in many prisons and jails.
Some of the offenders caught in this tidal wave of offenders were marginal who were deemed too serious for standard probation but too minor for prison.
A second factor driving the popularity of boot camps was their purported ability to simultaneously reduce prison populations and costs, while reducing recidivism, boot camp research paper. As discussed above, boot camps involved short-term confinement.
Proponents argued that these short periods of confinement were less costly than prison sentences, and consequently, boot camps would reduce prison costs and prison populations, boot camp research paper. Further, the harsh environment of boot camps were touted as effective in reducing recidivism via specific deterrence and perhaps more broadly via general deterrence. Thus, boot camps were advertised to be lower cost and more effective than traditional prisons.
This allocation was relatively small in monetary terms, but it served as an important, symbolic endorsement of the boot camp model. While boot camps became popular in the mid-to late s, they were not without controversy. Proponents touted the utility of boot camps as intermediate sanctions, as well as their effectiveness in reducing recidivism, prison populations, and prison costs. These claims proved controversial as empirical research addressing these issues was in its infancy prior to the period of boot camp growth.
Most fundamentally, critics contended that because boot camps did not address the underlying individual and contextual risk factors for criminal behavior, such programs would be ineffective. According to these critics, the boot camp model fails to address the known correlates and causes of offending and instead focuses on factors such as self-discipline and physical fitness, which are not strong correlates of offending. The gap between the attributes targeted by boot camps and the attributes known to predict criminal behavior is so vast that Latessa et al, boot camp research paper.
Further, given that history demonstrated most intermediate sanctions draw offenders from probation — not prison — boot camps were unlikely to reduce prison populations and costs. Other critics went a step further and argued that boot camps may actually be harmful.
For example, Mathlas and Mathews argue that boot camps not only widen the net i. Still other critics contended that boot camps confrontational and unsupportive environments would cause damage to young offenders, especially offenders with histories of abuse. These critics predicted that youths with histories of abuse boot camp research paper have difficulty adjusting to the boot camp environment. Likewise, Morash and Rucker argue that boot camps are abusive and dangerous environments.
These authors provide one of the earliest, most critical, and, in some regards, most prescient critique of the boot camp model. They argue that boot camps are steeped in images of masculinity and power. In short, few criminal justice-based interventions have been simultaneously as popular and as controversial as boot camps. These controversies stimulated research on boot camps and the popularity of these programs facilitated this research. Central to the disagreements between boot camp proponents and critics is the assumption that boot camps and boot camp research paper correctional facilities are vastly different.
Thus, a fundamental issue concerns the similarity between these two kinds of correctional facilities. Research studying the environments of these facilities finds that boot camps and traditional facilities do in fact differ in many regards. The most prominent research comparing the environments of boot camps and traditional facilities is the work of Doris MacKenzie and colleagues MacKenzie et al.
These authors surveyed juveniles and correctional staff at a large number of boot camps and traditional correctional facilities. Interestingly, both staff and juveniles indicated that boot camp environments exhibited greater safety in regard to inmate-to-inmate aggressive behaviors but boot camps exhibited somewhat greater danger to juveniles from correctional staff. This latter finding is explained by the fact that boot camp correctional staff typically used more confrontational disciplinary practices such as verbal reprimands and physical therapy as punishment.
These confrontational and sometimes aggressive disciplinary tactics, according to Lutze and Brodyraise concerns about Eighth Amendment violations and make boot camp research paper camps susceptible to civil, and perhaps criminal, litigation. The above findings are largely consistent with popular perceptions of boot camps and were largely confirmed in later research conducted in adult facilities.
The research, however, does not support certain popular perceptions about boot camps. Most notably, boot camps boot camp research paper more rehabilitative programming than is typically assumed.
Rehabilitation Research Boot Camp: Research Priorities \u0026 Study Types - Chad Cook - MedBridge
, time: 0:46Boot Camp Research Paper - Words | Bartleby
The use of institutional boot camps are on the decline. There is no evidence to support that it is effective on recidivism. Although it's purpose is to develop self discipline, respect for authority, responsibility and a sense of accomplishment many are Apr 23, · About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features Press Copyright Contact us Creators Boot camp is an alternative to incarceration. In this paper I will prove that Boot Camps for youthful offenders are effective. Boot camps started in the year by Warden Zebulon Brockway at the Elmira Reformatory located in Elmira, New York. The warden did this because he wanted to invoke a new way of disciplining and keeping the inmates active
No comments:
Post a Comment